Case Study of KIEU by studying Part III, Tu Hai and the reunification of Kieu and Kim Custom Essay

Finish your study of KIEU by studying Part III, Tu Hai and the reunification of Kieu and Kim, pp. 113 – 167. Study Unit 9, "Peer Editing" in the

Writing Guide.

Note: Because this is EWRT 2, I assume you know how to do parenthetical notes and Works Cited in accordance with the MLA, Modern Language Association,

convention. You should have learned that skill in EWRT 1A and or 1B. Nothwithstanding, you should study and restudy Unit 6 "Documentation/ Grammar

Guide" in the Writing Guide. There is an online tool linked to Unit 6 that allows you to input the information and receive a correct Works Cited

Source. Many students use and select the MLA Format. The CORRECT entry for KIEU is

Du, Nguyen. THE TALE OF KIEU. Trans. Huynh Sanh Thong. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.

There are a couple of keys to getting an "A" on this assignment. First you need to study Unit 4 and learn the various parts and pieces of an

argumentative theme. Pay particular attention to the Introductory paragraph, after you have framed your argument. The thesis should be RUP, (See Unit 3 for

this explanation of the noise a frog makes. The multisentence plan step should start with the words "I Say this Because." Also review the title

and the Concluding Paragraph. Hint: The introductory paragraph is a minimum seven sentences; the concluding paragraph is a minimum of five. But also think

small. Do NOT write about the main character or the whole book. The key to successful argument always is to focus and restrict, narrow your topic. (Don’t

forget this on your research paper either.)

THEME 2. Argue whether a character or the actions of a character, or any portion or the"The Tale of Kieu is Immoral," a hypothesis advanced by a

critically thinking, good student in this course. If you choose this route — in addition to using some definition of moral/immoral — use the Toulmin

model of first acknowledging the opposition — see Unit of the Writing Guide. That is to say, in your first body paragraph, you want to assume that

the opposite of your position is true. If you believe this work to be immoral, in your first body paragraph you should advance the arguments for the

morality of the work.
If you believe it to be a moral work, and that is your thesis, in your first body paragraph you must advance the arguments that would cause one to believe

it to be an immoral work. In either case you will need at least two body paragraphs to offset the first negative paragraph or vice versa. (We are obviously

talking Comparison/Contrast here–see Unit (subject-by-subject). No matter which approach you choose, think small. If you choose character as the

element of literature, recommend you NOT write about the central character of KIEU–that is just too unrestricted. Deal with a minor character–and NOT the

character you wrote about last week–or restrict yourself to a very limited, very narrow aspect of Kieu’s personality.

Feel free to ask questions or offer comments, critical or otherwise, about this assignment. Minimum 750 words, with parenthetical notes and Works Cited. In

your Works Cited include a statement summarizing with whom you worked and for how long.

Unit 9 of the Writing Guide contains a sample of how to peer edit using ALL CAPS and what your work should look like.

The correct Works Cited entry is above. Works Cited entries are done alphabetically by the last name of the author. Do not number your Works Cited entries.

Put "Works Cited" centered on the top of a new page. Do not forget to include with whom you worked and whether you visited AT 309.